Obtrusive Cost of Disruptions and Delays in Peace Process
Abstract : Ruptured peace process has been leading to the abyss in cauldron of crimes and repulsive law practices.
The trilateral peace process has critical junction for the stabilization of peace process between Taliban and Afghanistan’s vanguard of peace whilst Pakistan as mediating party. The government of Afghanistan and insurgents are at loggerhead to enforce the influence and powers on the subjects. This would have grim repercussions at endogenous and exogenous factors and impacts on the instability of country. first of all these issues reflect on the strategic significance and involvement of international parties in the current state of affairs.
These milestones events to broker the peace-process includes: end of combat mission; upsurge of violent assaults and internal rift in the leadership of Taliban exacerbate the already grim situation in the porous and landlocked country of Afghanistan. Thus, ruptured peace process has been leading to the abyss in cauldron of crimes and repulsive law practices.
The current trajectory of political sharing of the country presented the clear stance where Taliban government has 33 % share in the legitimate government for the southern region based on the ‘Pashtun’ ethnicity on the 66.5%. However, quid pro quo political custodian’s chief executive and president of Afghanistan (Ghani) weigh the rest of power to run the country. After the election of 2014 and end of combat mission in Afghanistan are the major milestones events to thrust the responsibility on the government to make structural reforms to advance economy; eradication of draconian practices of drug abuse and preservation of law & order situation in the vicinity of mountainous Afghanistan.
On the other hand, Taliban’s practices of insurgency became dormant and agile due to falter and unsuccessful devolution of powers from the ISAF (International security assistance forces) to ANSF (Afghanistan National security forces). The cornerstone seeds of failure to regulate rule of law as during the presence of international community is directed due to unskilled personnel, distort law enforcement agencies and lack of resources are high-flying factors.
The faction of Taliban announced a week ago about the selection of ‘Mullah Mansor’ as their new leader after the confirmation of former Mullah Omar’s death. The insurgent militant group Taliban –in the region of North Afghanistan- has been leading the faction since 1990. Merely, after the death of their supreme leader-drawing card of Taliban’s- the followers are in doldrums for the successor.
On the current juncture, Taliban’s have been confronting jeopardy for group rift into splinted groups, therefore, confronting three-pronged crisis: Leadership crisis; succession ambiguity and continuity of peace negotiations brokered by Pakistan. Primarily, Taliban’s leader successor- brother of Mullah Omar had been chosen rather than his son. On this decision, the followers opined are in water shed.
The right-wing have stance as selection of Mullah Mansoor is against their will because the supreme seven leaders and part of whole group choose him as successor. Whereas, left-wing argued: Taliban is group and leadership is based on skills and experience not on the basis of inheritance. However, this internal rift has implication for pursuing the peace process talks or bidding for overthrowing Kabul government into harsh Islamic rule of 14 years back insurgency. Thus, the contemporary leader called for unity and warned of rifting of group as enemy propaganda.


Comments
Post a Comment